Automotive rights: there is sufficient evidence to court more tricky

With the rapid development of the automotive market and the ownership increase, the volume of complaints also will increase. Car complaints network in 2013 received a total of 12,650 valid complaints (excluding e-mail , telephone, fax and other methods ) , an increase of 20.57% in 2012 . A substantial increase in the number of cars it will also bring increased automobile consumption problem in recent years, vehicle quality and service has always been a hot issue of complaints of consumer complaints . Therefore , more and more car owners have realized that to protect their interests with legal weapons .


Similarly, the combination of the online automotive complaint cases , the owners of sufficient evidence in the case, the court will have a higher success rate . So in case of sufficient evidence , litigation is more tricky, if the evidence is insufficient , the owners want to litigate it must be carefully considered . Here also highlights the importance of the evidence, so once encountered rights disputes , the owner must learn to keep good evidence.

In consumer rights litigation, often encounter some consumers because no activist experience , evidence ignored or did not take good care of activists led by the legitimate interests of the injured is difficult to obtain sufficient , reasonable protection last lawsuit and therefore fail. For this reason, to remind consumers : When your legal rights have been infringed , must pay attention to keep a good activist evidence.

If the evidence is not sufficient under the circumstances , the proposed owner or communicate with vendors, or choose other means of protection , for example, published a complaint or other media for help in car complaints network , of course, can choose to go to the local consumer association , business, transportation administration department consultations , etc. to be able to make the problem a turnaround .


According Kero Throttle Body noted that with the introduction of car Warranty policy expert technical consultation sessions , to resolve this dispute more than one path . Defective Product Management Center provincial send experts for technical advice, price 800 yuan / day based compensation , expert technical advice to get a final result . Although this result does not support the transfer of the appeal, but Liu convinced : "This process objective and fair , lacks opinions ."

Back to top